Legal Opinion
Cueroni v. Coburnville Garage, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 1, 1943PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The plaintiff seeks compensation for the construction of an addition to a garage under a written contract with the defendant Fantony, hereinafter called the defendant. The first count of the declaration is based upon this contract, the second is based upon a quantum meruit and the third count is for extras. The contract contained the following provision: “Should dispute arise relative to the work the same shall be settled by arbitration. The owner and contractor to select an arbitrator and those selected to choose the third party. Any finding made by them shall be final and binding on each…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Baker v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Korb v. Albany Carpet Cleaning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Andre v. MaguireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Russo v. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kelsey v. Hampton Court Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. GarganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- M. L. Shalloo, Inc. v. Ricciardi & Sons Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- MacDonald & Payne Machine Co. v. Metallic Arts of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.