Legal Opinion

People v. Dawson

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 3, 1955Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmer, J.

The defendants are charged with a violation of section 167 of the Labor Law which reads in part as follows:

*995“ When any driver of a motor truck or motor bus shall have been on duty continuously for ten hours or at separate intervals for ten (10) hours in the aggregate or less in any fourteen consecutive hours including time for meals, even though part of such time shall have been outside of the state of New York he shall not continue or again go on duty without • having had at least eight consecutive hours off duty. The periods of release from duty herein required shall be free from and off the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Larabee Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. H. P. Welch Co. v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. E. Fougera & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API