Legal Opinion
Albert Cunningham v. Robert Wong
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 8, 2013No. 09-99008PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner-Appellant Albert Cunningham (“Cunningham”) appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Cunningham was convicted of robbery/murder in California state court and was sentenced to death in 1988. He raises ten individual claims alleging error in both the guilt and penalty phases of his California criminal proceedings. His claims generally fall into three categories: 1) prosecutorial misconduct; 2) ineffective…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Roger Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Reynaldo Ayala v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Paul Zapata v. Rodolfo VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.