Legal Opinion
Dever v. Kelly
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 2, 2008No. 1:06-cv-00392PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 81) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 83), GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS SHERIFF KELLY, AND DEPUTIES CRAMBLETT, TILLMAN AND REED (DOC, 51) AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 37) AND DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE THE CLAIMS AGAINST MR. CLARK.
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crehan v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Jones v. PRAMSTALLERDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009