Legal Opinion

Liberty Property Trust v. Day-Timers, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, J.:

¶ 1 Liberty Property Trust d/b/a Liberty Property Limited Partnership (“Liberty”) appeals the judgment entered against it and in favor of Day-Timers, Inc. (“Day-Timers”) in this lease dispute. We reverse.

¶ 2 In 1988, Day-Timers, as lessee, entered into a lease with Liberty’s predecessor-in-interest. The lease, as amended in 1991 (“First Addendum”), contained a no oral modification clause which stated that any changes to the agreement had to be in writing. Article 4 of the First Addendum also provided a rent schedule which set forth a flat rental charge through June 1, 1996, and,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Tallarico EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Thermo-Guard, Inc. v. CochranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Zitelli v. Dermatology Education & Research FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Viener v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. American Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Fessenden Hall of PA., Inc. v. Mountainview Specialties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Lakeview v. Care Realty, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  5. MSR Resort Golf Course LLC v. Waldorf=Astoria Management LLC (In re MSR Resort Golf Course LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API