Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Wren

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 30, 1979No. ACM 22453Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partArrowood, Judge

In applying the criteria established in Relford v. Commandant, 401 U.S. 355, 91 S.Ct. 649, 28 L.Ed.2d 102, 657 (1971) to the evidence in this case, I do not find the service connection necessary for the exercise of court-martial jurisdiction. Therefore, I would set aside the findings of guilty to the Specification of Charge II, order it dismissed, and reassess the sentence based on the remaining findings of guilty.

[W]hen a serviceman is charged with an offense committed within ... a military post and violative of the security of a person or of the property there, that offense may be tried by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. HedlundUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. AlefUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API