Legal Opinion

Joe K. Devita v. Burlington Northern, Inc., Successor in Interest by Merger to Great Northernrailway Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1974No. 72-1776PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the district court setting aside the determinations of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, First Division, is reversed.

Devita, a locomotive' engineer, was discharged for alleged insubordination and inducing insubordination.

At issue is whether Devita took an appeal in time from the company superintendent to a higher official, the general manager. 1 Devita says he did not get timely notice of the superintendent’s decision, so he could not take a timely appeal. The railroad says the notice was promptly mailed, and its general manager and its vice president so ruled. 2

When the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deba Edelman v. Western Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. August Paul Rossi v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Sheehan v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API