Joe K. Devita v. Burlington Northern, Inc., Successor in Interest by Merger to Great Northernrailway Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The judgment of the district court setting aside the determinations of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, First Division, is reversed.
Devita, a locomotive' engineer, was discharged for alleged insubordination and inducing insubordination.
At issue is whether Devita took an appeal in time from the company superintendent to a higher official, the general manager. 1 Devita says he did not get timely notice of the superintendent’s decision, so he could not take a timely appeal. The railroad says the notice was promptly mailed, and its general manager and its vice president so ruled. 2
When the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deba Edelman v. Western Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- August Paul Rossi v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Sheehan v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1976