Legal Opinion

McMullen v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 27, 2018No. 2609 A-12955Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judge WOLLENBERG.

Daniel Matthew McMullen appeals the denial of his judicial peremptory challenge. Under Alaska Criminal Rule 25(d), the prosecution and the defense in a criminal case are each entitled to one change of judge as a matter of right. In this case, the court denied McMullen's challenge of District Court Judge John W. Wolfe on the ground that McMullen had previously exercised a peremptory challenge against a different judge, Superior Court Judge Kari Kristiansen.

On appeal, McMullen argues that his prior peremptory challenge never took effect because, two days after he challenged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gieffels v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Morgan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hickox v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API