Trustees of Phillips Exeter Academy v. Exeter
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
1. By the 1913 enactment (Laws 1913, c. 115) the legislature intended to repeal in its entirety the tax-exemption clause of the plaintiff’s charter, so far as it had constitutional power to do so and so far as it had not already been repealed by earlier enactment (Rev. St., c. 39, s. 2). An intent not to act in excess of power is to be found, but within the due exercise of powers, the design that the 1913 act should extend to all “institutions devoted to educational purposes, . . . incorporated within this state” (Ib., s. 1) comprehended the repeal of all special exemptions. “Prior to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In re the Governor & Executive CouncilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- City of Concord v. TompkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. ElbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Rye Beach Village District v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.