Legal Opinion

Schmershall v. Foster

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Commissioner.

— Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in this case because the transcript was not filed or served within the time allowed by Rule 26, and no extension of time had been secured under Rule 28 of this court, effective February 25, 1920. The appeal was perfected February' 21, 1921, when the rules of February 25, 1920, were in effect, which gave the appellant sixty days after the settlement of the reporter’s transcript within which to file the record on appeal. The reporter’s transcript was settled and allowed February 13, 1922, and the transcript was filed in the supreme…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gale Sulky Harrow Manufacturing Co. v. StarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Obermeyer v. KendallIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Sorensen v. WebbIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. BelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API