Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Webb

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

— This is an action on a promissory note. Respondent admitted its execution and delivery, but pleaded the following defense and counterclaim: That the note was given to pay the purchase price of a certain cow sold by appellant to respondent, to wit, $290, and the purchase price of certain fixtures, to wit, $34, the sale taking place February 26, 1919; that appellant knew respondent was purchasing the cow for breeding purposes, and warranted her to be with calf and a breeder, and that she had been bred on September 21, 1918; that respondent relied on this warranty; that the cow was not with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Alexander v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Earle v. CoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Beebe v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Keith v. de BussigneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Apple v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schmershall v. FosterIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API