Sorensen v. Webb
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.
— This is an action on a promissory note. Respondent admitted its execution and delivery, but pleaded the following defense and counterclaim: That the note was given to pay the purchase price of a certain cow sold by appellant to respondent, to wit, $290, and the purchase price of certain fixtures, to wit, $34, the sale taking place February 26, 1919; that appellant knew respondent was purchasing the cow for breeding purposes, and warranted her to be with calf and a breeder, and that she had been bred on September 21, 1918; that respondent relied on this warranty; that the cow was not with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Alexander v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Earle v. CoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Beebe v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Keith v. de BussigneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Apple v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Schmershall v. FosterIdaho Supreme Court · 1923