People v. Oliverio
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
The only point raised by appellant for a reversal of the judgment in this case is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction of bookmaking in violation of subdivision 3, section 337a 1 of the Penal Code.
Appellant presented a motion for a new trial which was denied, whereupon he was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail. Execution of the sentence was suspended and he ® was placed on probation for a period of three years. He has appealed from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. 2
A statement of the evidence will demonstrate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. WarnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BrazellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. MackieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957