In Re Lanning
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THURMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this case, the Chapter 13 Trustee appeals the bankruptcy court’s order denying one of his objections to the Debtor’s proposed plan. Although the Debtor did not participate in this appeal, the United States Trustee’s Office filed an amicus brief in support of the bankruptcy court’s decision. For the reasons stated herein, we AFFIRM.
I. APPELLATE JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction to hear timely-filed appeals from final judgments and orders of bankruptcy courts within the Tenth Circuit and, with leave of court, interlocutory orders. 28 U.S.C. § 158;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- In Re TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.