Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Leishman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1907No. 1700PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, First District; W. W. Maughan, Judge. Action by John H. Bailey and others against Andrew Leishman and another. From a judgment dismissing the action plaintiffs appeal'.

1Opinion of the CourtFlick, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of an alleged contract. The question for determination arises upon the sufficiency of the complaint. The material allegations of the complaint are, in substance: That on the 16th day of October, at Wellsville, Utah, the plaintiffs (appellants) and defendants (respondents) entered into a certain written contract in words and figures as follows: “Oct. 16, ’03. I hereby sell and agree to "deliver to Bjailey & Sons at their place of business in Logan City, Utah, 125 bushels of lucern seed at the rate of 10 3-4 cents per pound after same seed is recleaned;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Justice v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Prindle v. . CaruthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Sellers v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Justice v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fraser v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Le Vine v. WhitehouseUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wadin v. CzuczkaArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Baller v. SpivackMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Knapp v. BeachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API