Legal Opinion
State v. Barnard
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 18, 2003PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Steven Barnard appeals from a judgment entered after a jury trial in Superior Court (Washington County,'Mar-dew, J.) convicting him of aggravated trafficking in scheduled drugs (Class A), 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 1103, 1105(1)(E), (2) (1988 & Supp.2002).1 On appeal, Barnard contends that (1) the jury instructions regarding a laboratory analysis certificate constituted obvious error; (2) the evidence was insufficient to find that he trafficked within 1000 feet of the real property of a school; and (3) his sentence reflected a misapplication of principle. Finding no error, we affirm.
I. CASE…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SolerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Michael Joseph Johnson, United States of America v. Dolores Y. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- State v. TurnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- State v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. ChesnelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AhmedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- State v. CommeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- United States v. MohamedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- State v. DickinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- State of Maine v. Sanford R. King IIISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.