Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1993No. 9318SC299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The defendant here presents two valid assignments of error. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to consider, or ignoring, his financial resources in ordering restitution. The defendant further contends that the trial court erred in setting restitution greater than he can pay.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1343(d) (1988), which governs when restitution is a condition of probation, reads in pertinent part as follows:(d) Restitution as a Condition of Probation. — As a condition of probation, a defendant may be required to make restitution or reparation to an aggrieved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. BurkheadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API