Legal Opinion

Prince v. Freeman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1941No. 4581PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Chief Justice.

The question is whether the trial court erred in sustaining the appellee’s (plaintiff’s) motion for judgment on the pleadings.

In making such motion the plaintiff admitted that all of the controverted allegations in his complaint were untrue and that all well pleaded material allegations in the answer were true. Mammoth City v. Snow, 69 Utah 204, 253 P. 680.

The undenied allegations of fact contained in the complaint are as follows:

The parties are residents of the State of New Mexico. On the 23rd day of June, 1938, they entered into a contract of marriage which was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lanham v. LanhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Wooten v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Whitebird v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. In Re Gabaldon's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mammoth City v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGhee v. McGheeIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Panzer v. PanzerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Margaret A. Hopkins v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API