Legal Opinion

State v. Laird

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1979No. 16318PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

We are asked, once again, to measure our “carnal knowledge” statute1 against the *927contention that it is constitutionally infirm, insofar as it discriminates against males and denies them equal protection of the laws,2 though our latest pronouncement on this issue was made on November 20,1978.3

Defendant was tried and convicted of violating Section 76-5 — 401(1)4 before the District Court, Utah County, sitting with a jury. The evidence shows that defendant engaged in sexual intercourse with two fifteen-year-old girls, neither of whom was his wife, between the dates of November…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas E. Meloon v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. Alfred Page v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Wagner v. OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Neilson v. EisenUtah Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. of M.S.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. State v. StoneUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. MurphyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. MurphyUtah Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API