Legal Opinion

Bialeck v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 31, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The Hartford board of education in 1946 voted, “subject to receipt of necessary additional funds,” to pay each teacher a cost of living adjustment of $450. It requested an appropriation for that purpose from the city council. This was refused. The basic question is whether the teachers have an enforceable contract for the $450. The statement of facts is facilitated by two factors. None of the findings of fact are disputed. Most of the requests to have paragraphs of the draft finding added to the finding are abandoned. The rest are, in the main, either substantially included in the finding or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Board of Education of Stamford v. Board of FinanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Groton & Stonington Traction Co. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. O'Brien v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Webb v. MoellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Knox v. KnoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Luttinger v. RosenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Risi v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Board of Education v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Superior Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API