Legal Opinion

Applegate Apartments Ltd. Partnership v. Commercial Coin Laundry Systems

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1995No. 1—94—2492PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

The issue in this case is the quality of notice required to be given to a tenant in possession by a mortgagee in a consent mortgage foreclosure proceeding.

The mortgagee is Home Savings of America (Home Savings), which sold the foreclosed property to the plaintiff, Applegate Apartments, which subsequently filed an action for forcible entry and detainer against the defendant, Commercial Coin Laundry Systems, a tenant of the mortgagor under a written lease. The trial judge granted summary judgment to the defendant and denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. He also entered an order…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. The People v. NastasioIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. City of East St. Louis v. Union Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Graham v. O'ConnorIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Callner v. GreenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. v. McGahanIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Gorman-Dahm v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. Kurtz v. HubbardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Myers v. LeedyIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc. v. McGahanIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API