Legal Opinion
Crowley v. United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 19, 1975No. Civ. A. 72-C-398PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge:
This is an action for injunctive relief in which an Army reservist seeks to restrain the Army from ordering him to active duty and require it to grant him a discharge. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), and 12 (b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, alternatively, a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for summary judgment-under Rule 56. All parties have supported their motions by affidavits and briefs. For the reasons hereinafter indicated,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hawaii v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richardson v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kipperman v. McConeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
- Driver v. HelmsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977
- William Daniel Nicholson, Iii, Cross-Appellant v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Irby v. United States, Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- United States v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.