Marie Corinne Doudeau v. Target Corporation

Marie Doudeau appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Target Corporation in her personal injury lawsuit. On appeal, Doudeau argues that the district court erred when it held that no questions of fact existed about whether Target had constructive notice of the existence of a puddle of water prior to Doudeau’s fall. She asserts that Target employees knew that water regularly accumulated in this location and that this caused the floor to become slippery. Further, she argues that the district court ignored her claim for negligent mode of operation, and that a jury…