Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. Wisconsin Granite Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1929No. File No. 6326PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

To the complaint in this case appellant demurred on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from an order overruling the demurrer it appeals. The complaint alleged, in substance, that plaintiff is the owner of three lots in the city of Sioux Falls on which are situated residences and store buildings; that defendant operated a stone quarry within the city limits at a short distance north of plaintiff’s property; and that in conducting operations in the quarry appellant loosens the rock with high-power explosives, and that in so doing, by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Scott v. BayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Gibson v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Federal Land & Securities Co. v. HatchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Whitman Hotel Corporation v. Elliott & Watrous Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Green v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Brown v. L. S. Lunder Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API