Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Charles A. Flynn Insurance Agency, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 9, 1995No. 93-P-1550PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff Richard Robinson was injured in an automobile accident through the fault of one Cynthia Croft, whose bodily injury liability policy limits ($20,000), added to his own underinsured motorist coverage limit ($10,000), was insufficient to cover his medical bills. In this action the plaintiffs (Richard and his wife) are suing the insurance agency through which for years they had obtained their automobile insurance, alleging that the agency had a duty to advise them that they could, if they wished, purchase underinsured motorist coverage up to the amount of their bodily injury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandbulte v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Sobotor v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Tucker v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- McCue v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Bicknell, Inc. v. HavlinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sintros v. HamonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Baldwin Crane & Equipment Corp. v. Riley & Rielly Insurance Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Peter v. Schumacher Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Martinonis v. Utica National Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Wilson v. James L. Cooney Insurance AgencyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.