People v. Soto
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In this case we hold a defendant in a noncapital case may move to strike a prior conviction on Boykin/Tahl grounds notwithstanding the decision in Custis v. United States abolishing this remedy in the federal courts. However, defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a jury trial before pleading guilty in the prior proceeding. Therefore, we reverse the order striking the allegation of the prior robbery conviction and remand the cause to the superior court for further proceedings.
*1600Facts and Proceedings Below
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MaineMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- People v. Gandy, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.