Scott v. Pulley
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1ConcurrenceKoch, Judge
I concur in the majority’s opinion in this case in all respects. I do so because of the surrender hearing conducted by the trial judge on January 13, 1984. The record concerning this proceeding convinces me, as it did the majority, that the appellant was fully informed of her rights and the consequences of her decision and thereafter did not take timely steps to rescind her decision to surrender her child for adoption. However, the conduct of the Christian Counseling Services should not go without comment. Had it not been for the intervening action of the trial court, I would not hesitate to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Terrazas v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Tennessee Department of Human Services v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Bryan v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981