Legal Opinion

Puetz v. Cozmas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1958No. 29,628PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAchor, J.

This case comes to us on petition to transfer from the Appellate Court under Rule 2-23 of this court. See: Square D Company v. O’Neal (1947), 225 Ind. 49, 52, 72 N. E. 2d 654.

The facts and the issues presented in this case are substantially as follows:

Appellees brought this action against appellants to recover the possession of certain real estate in the City of Fort Wayne, and for damages for wrongful detention thereof. Trial to the court resulted in judgment in favor of appellees for possession and $500 damages. The error assigned here is the overruling of appellants’ motion for a new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Wallace v. Mertz, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Square D Company v. O'NealIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Habich v. University Park Building Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Parsons v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Saviano v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Paint Shuttle, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Fetz v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. JORDANIndiana Supreme Court · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API