Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ewing v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1888No. 14,330PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

The complaint or information in this case was substantially as follows:

“ The State of Indiana, on the relation of William Ewing, *2plaintiff, complains of the defendant, George W. Bell, and gives the court to understand that the county of Huntington was organized into districts, as they now exist, for the election of county commissioners, at the June term, 1839, of the board doing county business, and said districts were numbered one, two and three ; and your relator further says that in the year 1839 Nathan Fisher was duly elected and qualified as commissioner for district No. 2, to serve for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Parmater v. State ex rel. DrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Elliott v. BemenderferIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Parcel v. State ex rel. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Jones v. State ex rel. SnodgrassIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Harrison v. MenaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Corn v. City of Oakland CityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Conter, Treas. v. PostIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bell v. State ex rel. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API