Legal Opinion
Mund v. EMCC, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2009No. Civil No. 08-936 (JRT/JJK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Defendant EMCC, Inc. (“EMCC”) was hired to collect delinquent timeshare dues on behalf of the Royal Holiday Club, a worldwide network of timeshare properties. EMCC sent demands for payments to more than 1800 United States consumers. These demands all factored in “collection costs” equal to 35% of each consumer’s total debt. Plaintiffs William and Pamela Mund received this letter and argue that this practice violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), see 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seq. The Munds now seek…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Karen L. Keele, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Norman Paul Wexler, Mitchell Wexler and Wexler and WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Sonmore v. Checkrite Recovery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hartley v. Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- White v. 14051 Manchester Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Drake v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2017
- Harris v. D. Scott Carruthers & Assoc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2010
- Rikard v. U.S. Auto Protection, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.