Legal Opinion

Sandusky Portland Cement Co. v. Rice

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1907No. 5,889Published

Prom Kosciusko Circuit Court; Lemuel W. Royse, Judge pro tern. , Action by Lambert Rice against the Sandusky Portland Cement Company. Prom a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $460, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, P. J.

Action by appellee against appellant for damages alleged to have been sustained while working as an employe in appellant’s cement plant. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first is based upon the negligence of a foreman under subdivision two of §7083 Burns 1901, Acts 1893, p. 294, §1. The second paragraph counts upon the common-law liability of the master for failure to provide a safe place for his servants to work. There was a general verdict for appellee, together with answers to fifty-one interrogatories. Appellant moved that the court render judgment upon the interrogatories, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wabash Railroad v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Staldter v. City of HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. TackettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API