Legal Opinion

Matill v. City of Chattanooga

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Special Justice W. T. Bjennekly

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The City of Chattanooga has an Ordinance, No. 1054, creating the office of City Electrician and providing for the issuing of permits for the installation of electric wiring, electric fixtures, etc., and for the inspection thereof during installation and after completion.

Section 4 of this Ordinance is as follows: “No alteration or change shall he made in the wiring of any building, nor shall any building he wired for the placing of electric lights, motors or heating- devices, without first securing from the said City…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ward Seminary for Young Ladies v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. CollinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hughes v. Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hughes v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF CITY OF CHATTANOOGATennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API