Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Puls

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1946No. S. F. 17120Published

1Opinion of the Court

28 Cal.2d 664 (1946)

GEORGE DURHAM ROBINSON et al., Appellants,

v.

VERA PULS, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent.

S. F. No. 17120.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Aug. 1, 1946.

William Berger and Abraham Setzer for Appellants.

James R. Agee, Breed, Burpee & Robinson and Lester Perry for Respondent.

GIBSON, C.J.

This action was brought for declaratory relief, for cancellation of two promissory notes, and for an accounting if a trust were found to exist, or, in the alternative, for a money judgment. Defendant filed a cross-complaint, seeking a money judgment on two book accounts. Plaintiffs'…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Matter of Roge v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Robinson v. PulsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API