Legal Opinion
(PS) Ringgold v. Burgett Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 4, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00836Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD RINGGOLD, No. 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 BURGETT, INC., doing business as FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PIANODISC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff proceeds pro se with a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 19 a claim under the Fair Housing Act, and state law claims for wrongful termination and disability 20 discrimination. (ECF No. 1, Complaint.) This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local 21 Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.