Ex Parte Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Petition for mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court 1
101 U.S. 711 (____)
EX PARTE RAILWAY COMPANY.
Supreme Court of United States.
The case was argued by Mr. Roscoe Conkling and Mr. Samuel Shellabarger for the petitioner, and by Mr. Sidney Bartlett and Mr. George O. Shattuck, contra.
2Opinion of the Court · HarlanJustice Harlan
This is an application, by petition, for a writ of mandamus to the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado, commanding them to proceed and give final decree, in accordance with the opinion and mandate of this court, in the suit of the Cañon City and San Juan Railroad Company against the Denver and Rio Grande Railway Company. The…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Ex Parte NewmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Railway Co. v. AllingSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
- Ex Parte Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.