Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ruthart

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1998PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Applicant filed this post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court, which was then forwarded to this Court pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of two counts of driving while intoxicated. She was sentenced to five years in each ease, to run consecutively. No appeal was taken from these convictions.

Applicant contends, inter alia, she is being denied mandatory supervision on her first sentence. She explains that, although her calendar time served plus her accrued good conduct time equal her first sentence, the Texas Department of…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte CanadaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Barbee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Luciano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

4Cited by52 opinions

  1. Yazdchi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Ex Parte KuesterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Ex Parte HaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Bordman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Ex Parte ForwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API