Bowman v. . Agricultural Insurance Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The first question is, whether the second policy issued by the defendant was a valid contract in the hands of the plaintiff. He did not pay the premium for it. It does not appear that the defendant ever…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Petrie v. . Trustees of Hamilton CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Eggleston v. Council Bluffs InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Young & Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.