Legal Opinion

Bowman v. . Agricultural Insurance Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1875PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The first question is, whether the second policy issued by the defendant was a valid contract in the hands of the plaintiff. He did not pay the premium for it. It does not appear that the defendant ever…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Petrie v. . Trustees of Hamilton CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Eggleston v. Council Bluffs InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Young & Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API