Hardesty v. American Railway Express Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
charging the jury:
In order for the plaintiff to recover, he must prove to your satisfaction by a preponderance of the evidence, one or more of the acts alleged in the declaration. There are three things alleged: first, the acceptance of a certain quantity of strawberries in its capacity as a common carrier, and a failure to deliver the same to the consignee; second, negligent delay in transporting and delivering certain perishable property, namely, strawberries; and third, negligent lack of proper refrigeration in said delayed shipment of strawberries.
In Klair & Hollingsworth…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beard & Sons v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Brennisen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. DiffendalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- New York & Baltimore Transportation Line & Southern Pacific Co. v. Lewis Baer & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Ruppel v. Allegheny Valley RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Akerly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951