Legal Opinion
Stephens v. Herring
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 2, 1993No. Civ. A. 2:92cv143PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAYNE, District Judge.
Frizzel Stephens, a former Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants conspired to violate his constitutional rights and seeking monetary relief. The conspiracy claim grows out of this court’s decision in a previous action filed by plaintiff in which he claimed that Virginia’s parole eligibility statute, Va.Code Ann. § 53.1-151, was unconstitutional as applied to him. By opinion and order issued by the Honorable Robert G. Doumar on December 10, 1990, this court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Larry Bolin, Kenneth David Pealock v. Richard W. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Buttercase v. KopfDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
- Larry Bolin v. Richard W. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Larry Bolin v. Richard W. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Quigley v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2019