Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. SUCV201303409Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Janet L., J.

Having reached an impasse in negotiating the terms of their collective bargaining agreement, plaintiff Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and defendant Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO, CLC (Union) submitted their disputes to interest arbitration as required by G.L.c. 161A, §29. An Award issued on *83August 26, 2013. The parties are now before the Court seeking judicial review of that Award. Significantly, the parties agree that the issues were within the arbitrator’s powers to decide. Calling the award “irresponsible” and “unjustifiably rich,”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Flint v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. City of Worcester v. College Hill Properties, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Doherty v. Retirement Board of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API