Legal Opinion

PHI, Inc. v. Office & Professional Employees International Union

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided April 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-0016Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RULING

REBECCA F. DOHERTY, District Judge.

Pending before this Court are two cross motions for summary judgment, as follows: (1) Motion for Summary Judgment filed by PHI, Inc. (“PHI”) [Doc. 71]; and (2) Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Office & Professional Employees International Union (“OPEIU”) and its Local Union 108 (“Local 108”) (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the Unions”) [Doc. 72]. In its motion, PHI moves for summary judgment on its sole claim against the Unions in the main demand and on Claim I of the Unions’ Counterclaim against PHI. Specifically, PHI…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API