State v. McCleary
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
We have considered the briefs of the parties, they having by stipulation waived oral argument, on the question of the constitutionality of our statutes controlling lotteries, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-289, 14-290, and 14-292.1. We have also considered the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals and the thoughtful, well-reasoned, and thoroughly documented majority opinion of that court justifying its decision sustaining the constitutionality of the questioned statutes. We conclude that the decision should be and it is
Affirmed.
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PoseyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- McNeill v. Harnett CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. WyandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Animal Protection Society of Durham, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.