Legal Opinion

In re Glantz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1976Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the New York Bar in 1956. There were two charges leveled against him, both alleging failure to diligently prosecute claims of two separate individuals.

As to the first charge, respondent was forwarded the personal injury claim of one Carole Farr for prosecution. This action, after being commenced on Ms. Farr’s behalf by respondent was dismissed by order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered on or about July 2, 1963 for failure to prosecute. Such dismissal occurred as a consequence of respondent’s failure to appear or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WildoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API