Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harmon v. Mercy Hospital

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1990No. Civ. 890383Published

1DissentMeschke, Justice

Because NDRCivP 27(a) is a discovery rule and authorizes pre-complaint discovery, I respectfully dissent.

Rule 27 is positioned in the discovery part of the civil rules of procedure. Rule 27(a)(3) cross-refers to explicit discovery rules: “The depositions may then be taken in accordance with these rules; and the court may make orders of the character provided for by Rules 34 and 35.” Rule 26(a) diagrams the range of discovery authorized in this part of the rules:

Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions ...; production of documents or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paul Martin and Verla Martin v. Reynolds Metals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. Michael ShippCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. In re FerkaufDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  5. In re ErnstDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API