Legal Opinion

Swanner v. Swanner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Crenshaw. Tried before the Hon. P. 0. Harper.

1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Saffold, J.

The suit was by the appellee against the appellants, on an attachment bond. William Swanner commenced suit against the appellee, to recover rent and advances to make a crop, by attachment, on the ground that he had removed a portion of the crop without the consent of the landlord.. He pleaded first in abatement, and then in bar of this suit, the pendency of the attachment suit; but the court, on motion, struck out both pleas. There was no erroi; in this, because the statute (R. C. § 2992) expressly authorizes a suit to be commenced on the bond before the attachment suit is determined.

2. The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. v. SmallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Foster & Creighton Co. v. BoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Dunaway v. RodenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Jeff D. Jordan & Co. v. Yancey & AbernathySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Keel v. WeinmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API