Legal Opinion

Foster & Creighton Co. v. Box

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1953No. 1 Div. 470PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit on the common counts for certain work done by appellee, Box, for the benefit of appellant, Foster and Creighton Company, in which appellee recovered a judgment on the verdict of a jury.

The parties had a written contract for the work to be done by Box for the company. This was a subcontract. The company had a general contract to furnish all labor, tools, material, equipment, etc., necessary to construct a concrete pile wharf section for berth number 8 of marginal wharf at Alabama State Docks and Terminals at Mobile.

The particular work for which a charge is here made consists in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boykin v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. v. SmallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Lutz v. Van Heynigen Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Badders & Britt v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Upton v. Mississippi Valley Title Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Green v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Hendrix, Mohr & Yardley, Inc. v. City of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INC. v. HareCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. Port City Construction Co., Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API