Legal Opinion · Dissent

Taylor v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1987No. 868DC623Published

1Dissent

Judge Greene

dissenting.

I believe the trial judge erred in declaring plaintiff relieved of his obligation to support defendant. I disagree with the majority that the language of N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31A-l(b)(6) creates a bar to defendant’s claim under the separation agreement.

I

Plaintiff asserts that N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31A-1 requires the forfeiture of defendant’s contractual right to alimony because defendant entered into a bigamous marriage.

The relevant portions of Section 31A-1 are found in subsections (a)(5) and (b)(6). Read together, they provide that “[a] spouse who knowingly contracts a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Buffington v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Mayer v. MayerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. McIntyre v. . McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Haynes v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API