Legal Opinion

United States v. Randolph Queen

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 29, 1970No. 23524PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of robbery and assault with a deadly weapon in connection with the robbery of a cleaning establishment. On appeal he raises two points.

The trial judge sentenced appellant to prison for 4 to 12 years without exercising her discretion under Federal Criminal Rule 32(e) (2) to furnish appellant or his counsel the pre-sentence investigation report. 1 We reject the contention of appellant that under the circumstances of this case the failure to furnish the pre-sentence report violated due process of law. While we believe that the discretion called for by Rule 32 is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. William R. Mason v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rinehart v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. K. G. J. Pillai v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Airlines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. People v. WimberlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. United States v. Philip SmallwoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Jean D. DockeryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API