United States v. Randolph Queen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of robbery and assault with a deadly weapon in connection with the robbery of a cleaning establishment. On appeal he raises two points.
The trial judge sentenced appellant to prison for 4 to 12 years without exercising her discretion under Federal Criminal Rule 32(e) (2) to furnish appellant or his counsel the pre-sentence investigation report. 1 We reject the contention of appellant that under the circumstances of this case the failure to furnish the pre-sentence report violated due process of law. While we believe that the discretion called for by Rule 32 is the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- William R. Mason v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rinehart v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- K. G. J. Pillai v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Airlines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- People v. WimberlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- United States v. Philip SmallwoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Jean D. DockeryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.