Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1909No. Docket No. 163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wexford; Chittenden, J. Norman B. Anderson was convicted of violating the local-option law.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Respondent was convicted of an alleged *186violation of the local-option law. The information charged that on May 11, 1908, he sold and furnished to one Frank Wrigglesworth a certain quantity of malt, brewed, fermented, spirituous, and intoxicating liquor, to wit, 36 pint bottles of beer. Wrigglesworth testified that he bought a case of beer from the firm of Stewart & Anderson, and that he paid Anderson $2.50 for it. He could not recall the date, but testified that he got the beer in the alley by the storehouse of Stewart & Anderson. “ I understood that was where I would find it. It was after 8…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Welsh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Snider v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Briffitt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Kerkow v. BauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State v. SpiersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. CavicchiaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. People v. AdlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. AdlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API