Legal Opinion

People v. Clements

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 28, 1983No. 82SA570PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

The district attorney, pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 and section 16-12-102, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), prosecuted an interlocutory appeal from an order suppressing a confession and physical evidence which were essential to prove the commission of drug-related crimes by Alan D. Clements. Clements was charged with unlawful possession, distribution, and manufacture of amphetamines and methamphetamines, in violation of section 18-18-105, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Supp.). Following an extended hearing on motions to suppress the evidence the district court suppressed the confession which the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Garcia v. Dist. Court, 21st Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. McCall v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. People v. AmatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. DandreaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API