Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2014No. S-13-698PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. HILL 767 Cite as

288 Neb. 767

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Thylun M. Hill, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed August 8, 2014. No. S-13-698. 1. Expert Witnesses: Appeal and Error. The standard for reviewing the admis- sibility of expert testimony is abuse of discretion. 2. ____: ____. Abuse of discretion is the proper standard of review of a district court’s evidentiary ruling on the admission of expert testimony under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786,

125 L. Ed. 2d 469

(1993). 3. Judges: Words and Phrases. A judicial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. U.S. Pipeline v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. BraeschNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. KruseNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. TylerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. HoerleNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API